Political Quotes

Russ Feingold: I am voting in favor of the Levin-Bond amendment, and I want to explain my views in detail. Fuel efficiency is a…

On the recordMarch 13, 2002
I am voting in favor of the Levin-Bond amendment, and I want to explain my views in detail. Fuel efficiency is a critically important issue for our country, for my home State of Wisconsin, and for our future. I remain committed to the goal that significant improvements in automobile and light truck fuel efficiency can be achieved over an appropriate time frame. Some will argue that my vote for Levin-Bond is a vote against increasing the corporate average fuel economy, CAFE. I do not share that view. The Levin-Bond amendment seeks to renew the Department of Transportation's role in setting CAFE standards acting through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, NHTSA, part of the Federal Department of Transportation, DOT. If Congress does not act today to try to restore normalcy to the NHTSA process, Congress will always either block or act to set CAFE standards, every 20 years or so, when the political will is sufficient to do so. NHTSA will never be able to carry out the normal process of reviewing and incrementally improving fuel efficiency for automobiles and light trucks, as Congress originally intended when it passed the CAFE law in the 1970s. Both interest groups battling over the CAFE issue, the auto manufacturers and the environmental community, have switched their positions in this debate on this bill. The auto industry, who once wanted CAFE perpetually frozen with a rider, now support the Levin amendment.
Said by
Russ Feingold
Democratic · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the importance of fuel efficiency and the Levin-Bond amendment during Senate floor debate.

Share

More from Russ Feingold

Jan 10, 2021

I don't think there's any question. They were egging each other on. It would have taken very little for somebody to try to up the ante and actually hang Mike Pence or kill somebody who they could get their hands on.

msnbc.com
Mar 25, 2021

I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.

msnbc.com
Oct 12, 2020

This is actually hanging over her head. And so we have never had a president who we would ever think we'd do something like this.

msnbc.com
Jan 21, 2021

It is clearly constitutional to hold this trial now and to have the vote on disqualification.

msnbc.com

Other voices in this conversation