I want to speak today on S. 2290, the revised, but still misnamed, Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act. Reluctantly, I will oppose the motion to proceed to this bill. I say ``reluctantly'' because I support the concept of a national trust fund to compensate victims of asbestos-related diseases and address the severe strain that cases brought by those victims have placed on our legal system and our economy. Ten thousand Americans now die each year--a rate approaching 30 deaths per day--from diseases caused by asbestos. My home State of Wisconsin ranks 16th in the Nation in asbestos-related deaths. I was encouraged when the defendant companies in some of the many lawsuits that have been filed, their insurers, and organized labor began serious negotiations back in 2002 to try to develop legislation for a national trust fund that the Congress could enact on a consensus basis to address this serious problem. This was an issue that called out for a bipartisan solution. Unfortunately, those discussions were short-circuited before an agreement could be reached.
Russ Feingold: “I want to speak today on S. 2290, the revised, but still misnamed, Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act.…”
On the recordApril 22, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act and discussing the need for a national trust fund for asbestos victims.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
I found that troubling as well, and taking this idea of being careful way too far.
Jan 10, 2021
I don't think there's any question. They were egging each other on. It would have taken very little for somebody to try to up the ante and actually hang Mike Pence or kill somebody who they could get their hands on.
Sep 12, 2021
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.





