I opposed the amendments offered by Senators Cornyn and Boxer because they were a diversion from the real issue before us; namely, the future of our military involvement in Iraq. I disagreed with the language used in all of the ads addressed in these amendments, but we should not let those ads sidetrack the real work of the Senate. I hope the Senate will not get in the habit of condemning political speech, even speech that is offensive.
Russ Feingold: “I opposed the amendments offered by Senators Cornyn and Boxer because they were a diversion from the real issue before…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing amendments related to political speech during a discussion on military involvement in Iraq.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.
What they're putting out is you've heard of fake news. This is fake law. This is literally made-up law.
I would argue the DRL's work has never been more important than it is right now, with democracy going head to head with the growing threats of kleptocracy and authoritarianism around the globe.
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.





