I believe reaching a balanced budget by 2002 or earlier should be our highest priority. Thus, I am offering an amendment that will shorten the time for ratification of this amendment. As was noted on the floor by our colleague from North Dakota, Senator Dorgan, a few weeks ago, even if this amendment were somehow ratified at 2:10 today, tomorrow this Nation's deficit would be no smaller than it was when the amendment was adopted. The fact that this amendment in and of itself does nothing to reduce the deficit highlights one of my principal concerns with Senate Joint Resolution 1. That concern is that pursuing a constitutional amendment approach could, counter to what everyone suggests on this issue, actually delay action on the real work of achieving a balanced budget by providing what is, in effect, political cover for inaction while the States debate the question of ratification.
Russ Feingold: “I believe reaching a balanced budget by 2002 or earlier should be our highest priority. Thus, I am offering an amendment…”
On the recordFebruary 27, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing his amendment to the balanced budget amendment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
This is actually hanging over her head. And so we have never had a president who we would ever think we'd do something like this.
Mar 25, 2021
I don`t think people should be intimidated by Mitch McConnell`s threats, because you know what, he`ll do it anyway.
Jul 26, 2021
President Biden has stressed repeatedly that human rights must be at the center of our foreign policy, and I could not agree more.
Jan 10, 2021
I believe this can be done. I do understand the desire to, of course, give Biden a chance to have his first 100 days. But I think people should especially think in terms of what is most likely to lead to a serious opportunity to vote on…





