I feel strongly that the pomp and ceremony of a state visit is inappropriate at a time when the human rights situation in China and in Tibet remains such a serious obstacle to good relations. Simply put, it is my view that an official state visit is premature, absent a stronger commitment from China to improve human rights. I fear that this state visit will actually boost the legitimacy of a regime that brutalizes its own people and jails anyone who dares to complain. In other words, Mr. President, while dialog is important, you don't need champagne toasts and red carpets to have a dialog. Is the memory of the Tiananmen Square massacre so distant that we are willing to clink glasses with China's leaders as though nothing happened in Tiananmen Square?
Russ Feingold: “I feel strongly that the pomp and ceremony of a state visit is inappropriate at a time when the human rights situation…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of President Jiang Zemin's state visit to the U.S. amid concerns over human rights in China.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I don't think there's any question. They were egging each other on. It would have taken very little for somebody to try to up the ante and actually hang Mike Pence or kill somebody who they could get their hands on.
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.
You know what? Donald Trump could withdraw this nomination tomorrow. And I think people forget that.
It would be crazy for people to not do something strong now and make sure voting rights are protected out of some kind of a fear of what Mitch McConnell would do in the future.





