There are many other situations that might cause a student to fall out of status. For example, a teaching assistant might have to devote an unusual amount of time to grading papers, or a foreign government's tuition payment might be delayed. As I said, I understand that the current practice of the INS in such circumstances is to reinstate such students and scholars to a valid status so that they may continue their studies. Does the Senator intend that these and similar INS practices should continue?
Russ Feingold: “There are many other situations that might cause a student to fall out of status. For example, a teaching assistant…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of INS practices for students and scholars during Senate debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…
What they're putting out is you've heard of fake news. This is fake law. This is literally made-up law.
It would be crazy for people to not do something strong now and make sure voting rights are protected out of some kind of a fear of what Mitch McConnell would do in the future.





