I am sorry to say is yes. Increasingly, through the 1980's and early 1990's, there were systematic efforts in certain places to use permanent replacement workers. Among the ones that stick out is what happened to people in De Pere, WI, when International Paper chose to use permanent replacement workers. I held a hearing as a State senator, at the time, and heard some of the most compelling and troubling testimony I have ever heard as an elected representative from families that were broken by the loss of that job security that the Senator has described. In fact, I am quite sure that some of those folks were forced from being workers to being on welfare, as a result. I saw the same thing near Milwaukee, in Cudahy, WI, another very tense, and difficult, public hearing when the story of that situation was laid out. Closer to my own home in Madison, WI, a lot of pain, a lot of hurt, and a lot of destruction of family--another value that the new majority likes to talk about.
Russ Feingold: “I am sorry to say is yes. Increasingly, through the 1980's and early 1990's, there were systematic efforts in certain…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of permanent replacement workers on families in Wisconsin.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I would argue the DRL's work has never been more important than it is right now, with democracy going head to head with the growing threats of kleptocracy and authoritarianism around the globe.
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.
It is clearly constitutional to hold this trial now and to have the vote on disqualification.
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.





