I appreciate not only the comments of the Senator from Oklahoma but his leadership on the Budget Committee. I enjoy very much serving with him on the committee. I also appreciate the sort of change of tone from the opposition on this amendment. Everything we have heard about this amendment recently is how we need to have a weaker rule than the pay-go rule. Somehow we have to justify these exceptions that were put in the Budget Committee resolution. Finally the chairman is talking about what we really should be talking about, that we need a strong rule. What he has done is lay out some things our pay-go doesn't do. That is true. There may be some additional things we should do in this area. But what I am proposing, with the cosponsors, is let's at least go back to the rules we know worked, the rules that brought this country a balanced budget in the 1990s. They were proven to work. That is all this amendment does.
Russ Feingold: “I appreciate not only the comments of the Senator from Oklahoma but his leadership on the Budget Committee. I enjoy very…”
On the recordMarch 10, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of maintaining strong budget rules during a Senate Budget Committee debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
You may apply a legal standard to whether or not you should recuse yourself, but it's her decision. There's no appeal from it. She's not mandated to do it or not do it.
Jan 10, 2021
This is not just an insurrection. The oath they just took, Ari, was to defend against all enemies domestic or foreign. And these people were enemies of our country, domestic enemies who were trying destroy our government.
Nov 9, 2020
These Republican senators just have to know that their lives will go on, that they don't have to kowtow to President Trump anymore.
Oct 12, 2020
I found that troubling as well, and taking this idea of being careful way too far.





