I would like to explain an amendment related to U.S. development assistance to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DROC) that the managers of this bill have agreed to accept. This amendment revises Section 574 of the foreign operations appropriations bill for fiscal year 1999 to define restrictions on aid to DROC. It mandates that no aid may be granted to the Democratic Republic of the Congo until the President certifies that the DROC government is investigating and prosecuting those responsible for human rights violations or atrocities and is taking specific steps to implement a credible democratic transition program. When I originally began thinking about an amendment of this nature, I was concerned about the inability of the DROC government to follow up on what were really gross abuses of human rights committed during the takeover of the former Zaire by the rebel movement that became known as the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo (AFDL).
Russ Feingold: “I would like to explain an amendment related to U.S. development assistance to the Democratic Republic of the Congo…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment on U.S. development assistance to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I think they know they`re going to lose. And I think people like Graham may well decide that this is not one to fight on.
I don't think there's any question. They were egging each other on. It would have taken very little for somebody to try to up the ante and actually hang Mike Pence or kill somebody who they could get their hands on.
I found that troubling as well, and taking this idea of being careful way too far.
I believe this can be done. I do understand the desire to, of course, give Biden a chance to have his first 100 days. But I think people should especially think in terms of what is most likely to lead to a serious opportunity to vote on…





