More and more powerful economic interests are forcing consumers and employees to bring their disputes not to the courts but to a parallel legal system where the rule of law barely applies and where the outcome I think is stacked against them.
Russ Feingold: “More and more powerful economic interests are forcing consumers and employees to bring their disputes not to the courts…”
On the recordJune 30, 2010
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Feingold criticizes arbitration practices that disadvantage consumers and employees.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
I would hope that the Kamala will use this as an opportunity to raise the obvious point that this country is deeply infected with racial injustice.
Feb 8, 2021
Well, any example like Cassidy, where somebody is willing to stand up and go against their party, even if it`s on a procedural vote, John F. Kennedy wrote in 'Profiles in Courage' about those senators that had the courage to go against…
Jul 26, 2021
Democracy and human rights go hand in hand, and DRL is at the forefront of implementing President Biden's commitment to human rights.





