We need to have evidence-based policymaking, not policy-based evidence making.
Ron Johnson
The Public Record
Ron Harold Johnson is an American businessman and politician currently serving as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin, a position he has held since January 3, 2011. A member of the Republican Party, Johnson has focused on issues such as fiscal responsibility, healthcare reform, and government accountability during his tenure in the Senate. He has been an outspoken advocate for reducing the federal deficit and has often emphasized the need for economic growth through private sector initiatives.
It would be nice if climate change alarmists would stop scaring the you know what out of our children by telling them that the world is going to end in a dozen years, okay. It's not.
We need to have evidence-based policymaking, not policy-based evidence making.
we're actually--you're in a better position to prevent death by having the climate increase in temperature a little bit, right?
So I'm highly concerned about the corruption of scientific inquiries, scientific studies, because they're being funded by organizations, sometimes government that know what they want in terms of result.
I want to ask each one of you. Is this a crisis for your city, for your county?
It would be nice if climate change alarmists would stop scaring the you know what out of our children by telling them that the world is going to end in a dozen years, okay. It's not.
we had a witness that says about $5 trillion. So if your multiplier is accurate, we should have already seen about a 30 to 35 trillion dollar economic benefit from that $5 trillion.
By the way in the Inflation Reduction Act here, supposedly we got a little under $400 billion of energy credits and dollars going to what I would call green energy boondoggles.
Does anybody dispute that by their own models, if we were to eliminate all CO2 in America, it would have a negligible impact on global temperatures.
I'm highly concerned about the corruption of scientific inquiries, scientific studies, because they're being funded by organizations, sometimes government that know what they want in terms of result.
So Dr. Greenstone, that would be a really good analysis for your research, is again, take a look at the externalities and the cost of all this green energy.
climate change alarmists are leaping to all kinds of conclusions to scare the you know what out of the American public, to spend trillions of dollars, money we don't have that are much better spent in other ways.
What big wind towers are ever repaired and put back in service, and what is the life of one of these wind towers?
I have to admit I was surprised you've done all this research and you weren't aware of the Lancet July 2021 article comparing deaths caused by heat versus cold.
I'm not a climate change denier; I'm just not a climate change alarmist. You seem to be an alarmist.





