I find the Saudi Arabian human rights abuses abhorrent, as I think we all do.

If the DOJ and FBI continue to withhold these relevant documents, I hope this Subcommittee will use every authority we have to compel compliance through our legitimate congressional oversight.

I am highly concerned if Congress all of a sudden inserts itself into a process of saying, we are going to identify a U.S. business that we are going to say it so iconic that no foreign government or, we are going to say who can and cannot…

I think the overall solution here is a free press that holds everybody accountable.

transparency starts with within our own government, to become transparency to cough up what they know.

It seems like our Federal Government is probably doing more covering up for the Saudis than the Saudis are doing for themselves.

Our government is not being honest. They are not being transparent.

I always feel a great deal of sympathy for the people that are being ruled by authoritarian regimes.

On Monday, this Monday at 7:46 a.m. Central Time, I was in the Milwaukee airport awaiting my flight to D.C. when the entire terminal stopped and stood silent for 60 seconds to somberly commemorate the 22nd anniversary of the horrors of…

On Monday, this Monday at 7:46 a.m. Central Time, I was in the Milwaukee airport awaiting my flight to D.C. when the entire terminal stopped and stood silent for 60 seconds to somberly commemorate the 22nd anniversary of the horrors of…

On Monday, this Monday at 7:46 a.m. Central Time, I was in the Milwaukee airport awaiting my flight to D.C. when the entire terminal stopped and stood silent for 60 seconds to somberly commemorate the 22nd anniversary of the horrors of…

It seems to me that the overall question we ought to be asking is with limited resources, and we have limited resources, what's the best way to spend them?

So that is a huge vulnerability, I guess what I'm arguing with limited resources, I would much rather see us spend $60 to $90 billion to purchase those now, put those in place offline in case you have one of those high catastrophic events…

This is an apolitical science based issue, and we are using the process as a rhetorical tool to stop the projects that you don't like.

If it's going to be spent to mitigate climate change, I would argue it's probably going to be misspent because I don't think there's anything we can really do to hold back the tides.

Don't expect the federal government to come in and you know, bail you out.

This is no longer a republican issue, and I'm almost surprised in many ways that republicans pitch permitting reform, as it should be coming from the other side.

It seems to me that the overall question we ought to be asking is with limited resources, and we have limited resources, what's the best way to spend them?

If it's going to be spent to mitigate climate change, I would argue it's probably going to be misspent because I don't think there's anything we can really do to hold back the tides.

Don't expect the federal government to come in and you know, bail you out.

This is an apolitical science based issue, and we are using the process as a rhetorical tool to stop the projects that you don't like.

This is no longer a republican issue, and I'm almost surprised in many ways that republicans pitch permitting reform, as it should be coming from the other side.

So that is a huge vulnerability, I guess what I'm arguing with limited resources, I would much rather see us spend $60 to $90 billion to purchase those now, put those in place offline in case you have one of those high catastrophic events…

Don't expect the federal government to come in and you know, bail you out.

It seems to me that the overall question we ought to be asking is with limited resources, and we have limited resources, what's the best way to spend them?