People came up to me and said, 'We are afraid. Nothing is going to change for many, many years.'
Ron Johnson
The Public Record
Ron Harold Johnson is an American businessman and politician currently serving as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin, a position he has held since January 3, 2011. A member of the Republican Party, Johnson has focused on issues such as fiscal responsibility, healthcare reform, and government accountability during his tenure in the Senate. He has been an outspoken advocate for reducing the federal deficit and has often emphasized the need for economic growth through private sector initiatives.
The Senate, the Presidency, and the U.S. Government at large needs to strike appropriate balance between pursuing American security interests and being true to our own values.
the problem in Russia has more to do with the ability to speak truth to power once you know that truth.
So, they are certainly not fair elections, but, again, when he gets right down to balloting, if there was more free flow of information...
Americans are truly concerned with the decline of basic fundamental freedoms in Russia.
I would personally call on members of this distinguished panel to provide me the input... on what the prioritized listing of issues we should put in the letter.
It is extremely important, not only to businesses, but, again, any stakeholder, that they are listened to very carefully.
I guess there must be an Office of Ozone Regulation in EPA and they must be sitting around their office going, well, now what do we do?
I have come to realize that as a United States Senator to listen to the businesses coming in.
I have proposed things like a Sunset Committee, whose only mandate would be to reduce--identify and actually eliminate laws that are harmful or no longer useful.
I think all of government is well intended. But as we continue to throw more and more government at problems, you do reach that point of diminishing returns.
One of the valuable things that retrospective review could accomplish would be to identify rules that are having consequences other than those that were intended and might be having costs that are much higher than were anticipated.
I certainly look at that $1.8 trillion regulatory burden--I come from a manufacturing background--to understand how harmful it can be.
I have not found in my short time here that the Federal Government is particularly good at measuring the intended results of what they are trying to accomplish.
I love it when people agree on things. And it looks like we're all agreeing on: we need more spectrum.
I am finding this hearing quite confusing. I mean, it is true that, on May 23, 2013, President Obama did declare the global war on terror over?
So, really, nobody in the administration really believes the global war on terror is over. I mean, we are still involved in conflict.
But, generally, if you are manufacturing in Texas, even though you might have produced a product in New York, you are probably going to be taxed--well, Texas may be wrong. Let us say Wisconsin.





