In response to the gentleman from Pennsylvania earlier, Pennsylvania doesn't have to adopt this policy. It is totally optional for that State to do so. I find it interesting that the gentleman from New York is concerned about this while the State of New York already allows these heavier trucks on their roads in their State, as does the State of Wisconsin. The study supports the fact that this configuration would actually reduce life-cycle payment costs. That is in the study by the scientists, not the cover letter. So we have this dichotomy where 25 States already are running these heavier trucks. All my bill would do is allow them to move toward the interstate system. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Reid Ribble: “In response to the gentleman from Pennsylvania earlier, Pennsylvania doesn't have to adopt this policy. It is totally…”
Share
More from Reid Ribble
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Wisconsin will be postponed. Amendment No. 15 Offered by Ms. Brown of Florida The Acting…
I will wrap this up. I appreciate this debate. I will say this: I am not interested in whether truckers make more money or rails make more money. I am interested in the poor family that has to pay higher prices for food, for clothing, for…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of title I, add the following: SEC. 1__. CONSIDERATION OF USE OF NATURAL AND NATURE-BASED…
I have not mentioned protecting cattle at all. Maybe some of my colleagues will. I have only mentioned trying to protect the Endangered Species Act. {time} 1100 Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/4\ minutes to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr…





