Mr. Chair, I am in disbelief over the ridiculously low spending levels proposed by the Republicans in the Agriculture appropriations bill. They slashed funding to 2001 levels, funding from over 20 years ago. That is a 41 percent cut, $10 billion, to the people that feed America, our farmers. I don't see how any Member of Congress who represents rural America can show this much disrespect to their constituents. Certainly no Member from Wisconsin. Here are a few examples of what the bill does: It zeroes out the Dairy Business Innovation Initiatives completely, from $25 million to nothing. That is assistance for new and growing dairy businesses that want to get products like milk and specialty cheeses to market. If you are an economically distressed farmer, of which, unfortunately, there are plenty, this strips assistance for 104,000 farm loan borrowers. If you are a farmer who uses the Farm Service Agency for things like loans or disaster relief, this bill cuts FSA in addition to conservation programs like EQUIP that help farmers improve their operations and output. If you get energy assistance as a farmer, good luck with that. The REAP fund will be cut by over $500 million, making your energy costs go up in rural America. If you farm and supply food through international food programs, you are really out of luck because they cut it by $1.2 billion, a 69 percent cut.…
On the recordSeptember 26, 2023
Share & report
More from Mark Pocan
Mar 22, 2023
I think I would call that a cut. If it is not a direct cut, it is at least a bait-and-switch.
Nov 8, 2023
Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Wisconsin is recognized for 5 minutes.
Nov 8, 2023
Mr. Chair, I stand with the bipartisan statesmen who have argued against this amendment. I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from…
Apr 17, 2023
the title of today's hearing School Choice, Expanding Educational Freedom for all is somewhat ironic because the data of these choice programs shows these programs drain resources from public schools to fund private and religious schools.





