In order to have a Washington-run education program, we are going to tax the people in Wisconsin one dollar, and, assuming they get a dollar back, they are only going to get 60 cents to help the kids in the classroom. The rest of that money is going to be spent on all of this paperwork that first applies for it, that gets reviewed by Washington, that gets corrected in the application. The money gets sent out, then they send a report verifying how they spent the money, Washington reviews that report and sends out some sort of administrator to enforce the report. That is costing 40 cents. It does not sound like this helps my kids at all. So the other 60 cents might get to the classroom.
Mark Neumann: “In order to have a Washington-run education program, we are going to tax the people in Wisconsin one dollar, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inefficiencies of federal education funding during a floor speech.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
The key here is as we eliminate this waste, it provides us with the dollars necessary to reduce the tax burden on the American people, while, at the same time, leaving our hands off of Social Security, which is what the Social Security…
Help me understand why it is that, as a taxpayer sends their money to Washington, and Washington decides how to best provide education for those kids back home, what exactly is it in the water out here or what is out here that makes us…
Would it be fair to say when we look at the Labor Department, they are missing $3 billion, and if we could cut out that part where they cannot find any, we could apply that $3 billion to tax reductions to the American people?
It passed without a single, solitary Republican vote. I am sure the gentleman from Michigan remembers what I am talking about here. It is the biggest tax increase in American history.





