When you look back at Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the failures to keep their promises and when you look back at the tax increases of 1993, yeah, but we cannot control Washington spending, it is easier to take the money away from the people. Until we got a new group and we have been concentrating here in the present and all these good things that are going on, as we talk about change in education, as we talk about welfare reform, and we talk about being in the third year of a 7-year plan to balance the budget, we are on track, ahead of schedule, reducing taxes for the American people.
Mark Neumann: “When you look back at Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the failures to keep their promises and when you look back at the tax…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary reforms and tax reductions during a speech on the House floor.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
For the first time since 1969 for the last 12 months running, this government spent less money than they had in their checkbook. That is just a monumental change in the way things have been done. I should say it again because it is that…
Right. Again, I think we have to go back to this understanding that, when people out here talk about cutting spending, they do not actually mean they are cutting spending. They mean, instead of letting the growth rate be double the rate of…
And I think that is the point of this whole discussion. We can do tax cuts without touching the Social Security money. There is absolutely no reason in the world that this government should take the money coming in from Social Security and…
My only fear listening to this, most of what you said I agree with wholeheartedly, as you well know, is that this becomes very partisan, and Social Security is too important to become partisan. Many of us Republicans also feel that it is…





