I rise to oppose this motion to instruct. I would like to correct what was just said. Mr. Speaker, what we are being asked to do tonight is we are being asked to support the concept of the deficit going back up again in fiscal year 1997. I repeat, if we go along with this motion tonight, we will have the deficit going back up again in 1997. I do not think there is a single American out there who wants our deficit going back up again. The Senate bill asks us to spend $5 billion more than the House-approved plan. I did something special for tonight, I went and dug out our original blueprint to a balanced budget that we passed last year. Guess what, the House-passed plan already has $7 billion more in spending than our original blueprint, and now we are back here asking for more spending yet. I thought it was time we got spending in line so we could get to a balanced budget to preserve this Nation for our children. It is about time that we recognize that balancing the budget means more opportunities for our families, more job opportunities for our families, and more opportunities for them to live the American dream. That is what this is about. It is about choosing if we are going to head back off in the wrong direction again, let the deficits go back up again, start spending more money, watch this thing go back in the direction that led us down to this $5 trillion debt in the first place. I, for one, am opposed to that.
Mark Neumann: “I rise to oppose this motion to instruct. I would like to correct what was just said. Mr. Speaker, what we are being…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a motion related to the federal budget and deficit during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
yes, those deficits that the American people and my colleagues talked about all through the late 1980s and the early 1990s, they took all of that Social Security surplus, they put it all in the big government checkbook, they wrote out…
I get excited when we get to this point, because all of a sudden we begin to understand that we are no longer in 1993, whining and crying that we cannot do anything other than raise taxes on the American people to solve government…
The key here is as we eliminate this waste, it provides us with the dollars necessary to reduce the tax burden on the American people, while, at the same time, leaving our hands off of Social Security, which is what the Social Security…
the facts for this year are that we may in fact have the $98 billion. It is close. It is some place between on the bottom end probably 79 or 80, and on the top end about 103 or 104 billion. The surplus is right in-between there. Right now…





