both the U.S.-Chile and U.S.- Singapore Free Trade Agreements include several important provisions within the purview of the Judiciary Committee. Both agreements contain competition clauses that ensure antitrust laws are applied in a neutral, transparent, nondiscriminatory manner while safeguarding basic procedural rights. The agreements also contain robust intellectual property protections, requiring the governments of Chile and Singapore to take affirmative steps to eradicate the piracy of trademarks, patents, satellite television signals, and other forms of intellectual property. These intellectual property provisions are widely supported and are likely to serve as a model for future Free Trade Agreements. The intellectual property and antitrust provisions required no substantive changes to U.S. law. For the last several years, I have vocally and repeatedly expressed concern about substantive changes to U.S. law contained in free trade agreements.
Jim Sensenbrenner: “both the U.S.-Chile and U.S.- Singapore Free Trade Agreements include several important provisions within the purview of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the U.S.-Chile and U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreements and their provisions.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
But obstruction of Congress, when there is no referee, there is no adjudication, there is nothing but a majority that says, 'You give us what we want until we find a crime, or we are going to throw you out of office,' that is so…
It is my intention to raise a point of order that this resolution requires a two-thirds vote. I will argue the point of order when it is made, but I need to know when the proper time is to raise the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore…
I am no stranger to this debate. In the aftermath of 9/11, I stood on this floor to advance the USA PATRIOT Act. I still believe, as I did at the time, in its necessity to protect our country from terrorist attacks. In 2015, after abuses…





