Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: my amendment does not alter the substance of the bill, it simply clarifies it further. First, to clarify and ensure…

On the recordMarch 10, 2004
my amendment does not alter the substance of the bill, it simply clarifies it further. First, to clarify and ensure consistency in interpretation, it simply amends one phrase in the bill's stay provisions in Sec. 3(c) to track language used in the bill's pleading requirements in Sec. 3(d). Second, it replaces Sec. 4(5)(c) with language making it clear that the term ``qualified civil liability action'' does not include an action brought under the Federal Trade Commission Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. I believe that this change satisfies the objections that the Committee on Energy and Commerce levied against the bill. I would urge the Members to support my clarifying amendment.
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment to clarify provisions in a bill related to civil liability actions.

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Dec 10, 2019

It is amazing to me that, again, the things that will come out of this markup is not the simple fact that they are going to mark up this and they will send it to the floor.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2019

And that is not what the law said, and it is not what the law should be.

congress.gov
Feb 13, 2020

I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2020

Wouldn't that be up to somebody on the other side of the issue to say that this is not proven?

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation