we are not currently at war with another nation and the Cold War has been over for more than a decade. But we alone already spend more on our military than the 21 countries with the next largest defense budgets combined. Our military spending is greater than the total defense budgets, added together, of Russia, China, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Italy, India, South Korea, Brazil, Taiwan, Israel, Spain, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Turkey, Mexico, Kuwait, and the Ukraine. Nonetheless, before us today is a bill, H.R. 1588, FY04 Defense Authorization, that would authorize an increase of $7.6 billion for a total defense budget of $400.5 billion, the highest in this country's history. This legislation authorizes $3.5 billion for the F-22 Raptor, an air superiority fighter designed to fight the Soviet Union. This program has seen continual cost overruns and encountered technical problems, and now represents the most costly jet fighter ever built. However, the other fighters that the F-22 is designed to replace continue to perform admirably and the only countries that possess aircraft that even come close to parity with our existing fighters are our allies in NATO, as well as Russia. Given this program's troubled history, it is likely to balloon in cost even more, and is hardly a bargain for our military and taxpayers.
Gerald Kleczka: “we are not currently at war with another nation and the Cold War has been over for more than a decade. But we alone…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military spending and the FY04 Defense Authorization bill.
Share
More from Gerald Kleczka
I sat here and listened in amazement as my Republican colleagues came crying crocodile tears for the poor unemployed who lost their benefits as of December 28. As I recall, back before we adjourned in November the Senate sent an identical…
the gentleman from Arizona who just spoke advised us to listen to our seniors; and many of us, I say to my colleagues, are doing just that with our vote today. Here is a senior from my district who advises me to oppose this bill, and they…
let us put this debate into some perspective. First of all, we do not have a death tax in this country. Nowhere in the statute does it mention the word ``death tax.'' What we have and have had since 1916 is an inheritance tax paid to the…
But is it not true that they would stand to lose money in 2010 if we do not repeal the sunset?





