On the recordJune 13, 2002
But is it not true that they would stand to lose money in 2010 if we do not repeal the sunset?
Source
govinfo.govGerald Kleczka: “But is it not true that they would stand to lose money in 2010 if we do not repeal the sunset?”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a sunset provision during a debate.
Share
More from Gerald Kleczka
Jul 26, 2001
I cannot dispute that. In part there is legislating contained in this amendment. But in large part, and I think the gentleman would agree, if in fact the IG is even close to the mark, saving $1.3 billion in the legislation that the…
Sep 19, 2002
I would challenge him to tell the House when we passed legislation to reduce the cost of prescription drugs for everybody in this country. There is a discharge petition pending and I challenge him to sign it if he is serious about that…
Mar 20, 2003
I back this resolution because of my complete support and admiration of the brave men and women in our armed services. Each of us owes a debt of gratitude to these selfless individuals who have put themselves in harm's way in service of…
May 25, 2000
No. The point being that it is not 102 years old and around since the Spanish-American War. It was repealed after that war in 1902. So the gentleman is inaccurate on that point.
Other voices in this conversation
