Mr. Chairman, obviously, the National Science Foundation does not get it. The U.S. taxpayer should not be funding research that has dubious scientific merit, at best. This is why we should support the Sanford amendment. We need to send a strong message not only to the National Science Foundation, folks, this is not just about one agency. This is about every agency that determines how to use its Federal dollars. Now, I got a very nice letter back from the Office of the Assistant Director for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences trying to justify that this was a very important study. I still would ask my colleagues to ask every American taxpayer at home, do they think we should spend $107,000 to find out why people laugh at dirty jokes? I would say no.
Thomas Foley: “Mr. Chairman, obviously, the National Science Foundation does not get it. The U.S. taxpayer should not be funding…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about funding for research by the National Science Foundation.
Share
More from Thomas Foley
A full life is not just about what you do with your years on this Earth, but about how you make people feel long after you've left it.
on rollcall Nos. 177 and 178 I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on both measures. ____________________
let me start by suggesting that I know all of us in this room are concerned about the viability of pensions. We want people who have worked their entire life to get the benefit of those investments. What we are also, though, trying to do…
I enjoyed my colleague's tirade on trade. He says there is too much coming in, but they consistently vote against any going out. They do not assist us in the trade policy that will bring balance to trade. What have we done positively? Let…





