a document being circulated by the Association of Trial Lawyers of America [ATLA] and their allied professional interest groups makes the accusation that the conference report on H.R. 956, the Commonsense Product Liability and Legal Reform Act of 1996, is radically different than the bill passed by the Senate. The contingency-fee lawyers' argument about commonsense product liability reform is unfounded. Anyone who reads the conference report and compares it to the Senate bill can see for themselves that, except for change in the time period, not the narrow scope, of the statute of repose and two slight modifications to the additional amount provision, the conference report is virtually identical to the Senate bill. All familiar with the history of this bill also know House Members delayed going to conference, and then agreeing on a conference report, for almost a year until it became apparent that Senate allies of the trial bar would not support legal fairness legislation going beyond the Senate bill. Facts are a stubborn thing for these lawyers, because as hard as they try to avoid them or argue around them or simply ignore them, as is often the case, the facts never change. And, the fact is that the product liability conference report is a narrow and limited proposal that almost mirrors the Senate's version of H.R. 956.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing accusations regarding the Commonsense Product Liability and Legal Reform Act of 1996.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I wish to say to my good friend from Utah that I agree that draining Lake Powell is not a reasonable proposal, and I support his effort to put the issue to rest with this amendment. However, I would like to ask my colleague from Utah if he…
I concur with this observation about the poor BIA oversight and management of locally operated TPA programs. The BIA has not been able to tell the Senate just how these funds are spent by tribal governments. Other than broad categories…
I am aware of these efforts and would encourage the National Park Service to work closely with the native corporation to further develop this proposal in light of the fact that they use private dollars to maximize public resources. Visitor…
Americans have acquired far greater choice today after the implementation of those fuel efficiency standards than they had previously. The interesting part of the ad, which was just handed to me--I had not previously seen it--says: Say yes…





