I would point out to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock] that if his objective is to not have this kind of material in any way distributed at some kind of school-sponsored program, he should read my amendment, which states: No local educational agency shall use funds under this act to distribute or to aid in the distribution by any organization of obscene material to minors on school grounds. Now, I believe that that takes care of his issue. I would also like the gentleman to read his own definition in his amendment which says that a program or activity for purposes of this section which should be prohibited includes the distribution of instructional materials, instruction, counseling, or other services on school grounds or referral. So under your definition of what would be prohibited would be a referral of a pupil to an organization that affirms or discusses a homosexual lifestyle, even in the context of providing health care.
Jolene Unsoeld: “I would point out to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock] that if his objective is to not have this kind of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to educational materials and obscenity.
Share
More from Jolene Unsoeld
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding to me. Madam Chairman, some speeches coming from across the aisle would be much more appropriately made before a local school board. This is not an amendment about values, it is not an amendment about…
I rise in strong support of H.R. 2760, our committee's bill to reauthorize the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The MMPA's success in restoring marine mammal populations on the west coast is evident by the robust species of California sea…
I rise today as a member of the Committee on Education and Labor to speak in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York. Mr. Chairman, we have been through this battle before. Any Member who opposes Federal…
I ask my colleagues to support my amendment to the Hancock amendment to H.R. 6. The Hancock amendment once more would give the Federal Government jurisdiction over curriculum decisions. What with all of the discussion we have heard in this…





