I rise today as a member of the Committee on Education and Labor to speak in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York. Mr. Chairman, we have been through this battle before. Any Member who opposes Federal mandates, particularly in the area of education, should vote no. I say to my colleagues, ``If you believe in getting government off people's backs, for goodness sake, don't impose this mandate because, if it passes, we undermine local control of schools.'' I said this before: Education has always been a local matter. This includes the education of our Nation's high school and postsecondary students. To deny a school's Federal funding because of its decision to prohibit military recruiting on campus clearly violates this principle. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to join with, among others, the American Council on Education, the American Bar Association, and the Department of Defense in opposing this amendment.
Jolene Unsoeld: “I rise today as a member of the Committee on Education and Labor to speak in opposition to the amendment offered by the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to federal mandates in education during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Jolene Unsoeld
I want to commend Subcommittee Chairman Pat Williams of the Committee on Education and Labor for his outstanding universal health care plan. It is based on a simple principle: Every person in this Nation has the right to decent and…
that is a local school and locally elected school board's decision, not the Federal Government's.
I ask my colleagues to support my amendment to the Hancock amendment to H.R. 6. The Hancock amendment once more would give the Federal Government jurisdiction over curriculum decisions. What with all of the discussion we have heard in this…
But a threat prior to the vote is probably exactly the kind of lobbyist influence to which the public objects and to which we should try to rise above as a legislative body representing those people.





