These actions place substantial financial burdens on Americans that lower their standard of living.

Before you finalize the rule, Mr. Administrator, it's my hope that there will be cleared-eyed, thoughtful consideration given to what the impact to our national security could be if American energy production is throttled right now with a devastating, potentially expanding war in Europe, and China becoming more belligerent in the Pacific.

The EPA doesn't need more money. Its regulatory agenda is out of touch with the needs of the American people.

As the elected representative of the people, I was encouraged that the Court ruled that EPA had exceeded their legislative authority.

The concerns we raise today are directly from the people that we represent, and we're concerned by the EPA's regulatory agenda.

It is a dangerously dependent policy that's going to put us dangerously dependent upon China.

Now, regarding the subjects we'll cover today, they're best described as an EPA regulatory onslaught.

the proposed tailpipe emissions standard is driving us further towards China dependence.

This is not what the EPA is designed to do.

Yes, Republicans do care about the climate and the environment.

Time and again, by its own admission, we've seen this administration first choose a policy goal, like forcing consumers to purchase all-electric cars, whether practical and affordable or not, shutting down oil and gas production, or shutting down reliable and dispatchable power generation, and then on the back end attempt to shoehorn an EPA regulation in to achieve these ends.