Personally, I support the drawdown. I think the fewer troops we have there, the better, going forward for a variety of different reasons.
the amount of money we are requesting, or that we envision inside this request--the $500 million--is a pretty reasonable...
I would suggest better the 'how' is we want to train them and equip them so that they are better positioned to fight.
this is more for the White House: Sell it. Because if you don't, there ain't no way we are going to pass it.
I am telling you, this is really, really poorly drafted in terms of narrowing it down to a specific set of purposes.
I don't support sequestration. I would expand upon that to say I don't just oppose sequestration for the Department of D...
The purpose of the Overseas Contingency Operation from when it was first set up--the funds were to fund the efforts in I...
Contained in one of those funds is an authorization for a Department of Defense [DOD] effort to support friendly rebels ...
I have been around here long enough to know that that is far from a black and white issue.
One of the things that we really focus on is how can we make quicker decisions.
I am struck by the fact the people who are building the newest carrier, the Ford, accused of cost overrun...