Those that find out that there are sitings of toxic dumps in minority communities that are resulting in the poor children suffering and contracting asthma, cancer.

This court is leading the country down a dangerous path, where it seems States' rights predominate over people's rights.

I don't know where this pesky idea of the Federalist Society came from, probably because one of the nominees testifies here under oath that he was told if he wanted to be a Federal judge appointed in the Bush administration, he should join…

Well, I would hope you wouldn't suggestion that President Bush's nominee who we confirmed as a Federal judge would be lying under oath.

I hope that the Committee can have a fresh start.

The very point of the article or this section of the article--this was the same article, I should point out, that was criticizing the Court for a ruling that heard disability rights.

We federalize carjacking. We federalize so many things. We don't really need to.

Well, we are written into the Constitution, the U.S. Constitution.

One thing that we talk about is the impartiality of our Federal Judiciary.

Are you comfortable with that direction of the Supreme Court?

I was persuaded by the conclusion that the best reason that States should not enjoy immunity from suit is that such treatment is simply unjust.

I do not think it serves the interests of the American people for us to point the finger across the aisle.