It seems to me that when years have passed, people under investigation ought to be told if the investigation is over.
Patrick Leahy
The Public Record
Patrick Leahy is a former United States Senator from Vermont, serving from 1975 until 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the longest-serving senator in Vermont's history and held significant leadership roles, including President pro tempore of the Senate. Throughout his tenure, Leahy was known for his work on issues such as civil liberties, health care, and environmental protection. He played a key role in various legislative efforts, including the Violence Against Women Act and initiatives to reform the criminal justice system.
The Director has been very open in his efforts to balance the efforts in law enforcement while maintaining the values and the freedoms that we hold dear as Americans.
Oversight is one of our most important responsibilities, and this Committee has taken it very seriously.
We are going to consider the important issue of how best to ensure that when people get out of prison, they become productive members of society rather than turning to a life of crime.
It's very difficult for us to legislate--to pass legislation to expand rights.
I know we felt that way, my wife and I felt that way about our son. We worried about him in the Marine Corps, but we were so proud of what he was doing.
It is a fair question to ask a nominee in what direction would you move the Court.
They assured Senators that as lawyers for a Presidential administration they were representing the views of the President.
I cannot imagine anybody saying we should go back to Plessy v. Ferguson because that was decided first.
I was really shocked by former Chief Justice Rehnquist's position on the Laird case.
Is there any doubt after the Court's decision in Heller and McDonald that the Second Amendment to the Constitution secures a fundamental right for an individual to own a firearm, use it for self-defense in their home?
Our constitutional duty of advice and consent is imperative and should not be taken lightly.
The Court should have a broader range of perspectives than just gleaned from the appellate branch.





