That is right. What you have proposed which makes sense is you want an objective analysis of the costs involved in a mandate. Fair enough. I agree with you. It seems to me what we want is an objective, nonpolitical analysis as best as they could do which certainly will not be perfect in terms of the benefits, as well. So that they could come forward, not in a political way, not on a 16 to 13 committee vote; they say, ``Look, if you invest $10 million, you are going to save $100 million in health care costs.'' Then you analyze that objectively as opposed to the partisanship which so often exists in committees.
On the recordFebruary 1, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for objective analysis in health care cost mandates.
Share
More from Bernie Sanders
Aug 15, 2026
They’re saying, What the hell are we doing? What is this gonna contribute to? Is this gonna result in my kid not being able to have a job? Is this gonna result in my not having any privacy? Why am I aiding these large corporations owned by…
Aug 19, 2026
We do not need to spend $1.5tn a year on the Pentagon fighting endless wars and propping up dictatorships around the world.
Aug 19, 2026
We believe that the federal minimum wage should be raised to a living wage of at least $20 per hour.
Aug 15, 2026
Meanwhile, while the rich get richer, millions of Americans cannot afford the basic necessities of life—food, housing, healthcare, and a decent retirement.





