Well, let me just reply to that. We can do that, but CBO cannot really address anything but the fiscal costs. The benefits are really not within their purview. It is not within their expertise. This has not been something we have traditionally assigned them to do. That is what makes the gentleman from California's amendment more difficult to put in this body, although I think that the goal of it is one which I can sympathize with.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of the Congressional Budget Office in evaluating amendments.
Share
More from Hon. Thomas M. Davis
In fact, if we went further and tried to tell these States what their sentencing procedures could be, we would be screaming bloody murder and the States would be really making an outcry. Mr. Speaker, but this does hold somebody accountable…
let me first of all thank my friend, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn), who I disagree with on this issue but I think has shown an amazing amount of integrity as he deals with the budget deficit, really taking no prisoners or…
secure information is the lifeblood of effective government. But we've seen a wide range of incidents involving data loss or theft, privacy breaches, and security incidents at Federal agencies. In almost all of these cases, Congress and…
it is a privilege to address this first page school class of the millennium here today. And although I served 4 years, it was in the other body, so it seemed like about 10 years. And this is a much faster and brisker pace over in the House…





