As we know, language was included in the House bill, H.R. 2400, which would have directed the Commonwealth of Virginia Transportation Board to resolve funding issues relating to rights-of-way acquisition and engineering overruns associated with segments of the Fairfax County Parkway. Mr. Speaker, is it the intent of the legislation that this provision be applicable?
Hon. Thomas M. Davis: “As we know, language was included in the House bill, H.R. 2400, which would have directed the Commonwealth of Virginia…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of House bill H.R. 2400 related to Virginia's transportation funding.
Share
More from Hon. Thomas M. Davis
I wish to clarify that amendments to section 424 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act are not intended to limit the authority granted to the District of Columbia's Water and Sewer Authority in the District of Columbia to maintain and…
Let me say to my friend, this was a concern, but in working with Mr. Murphy, the author of this provision, we feel that in the light that--the sirens will go out, not just for contractors, but for grantees, too, on Federal grants and the…
I rise to bring to the attention of my colleagues the celebration of Food Allergy Awareness Week
I thank my colleague for recognizing me on this. Let me just note this ought to take care of a number of concerns that were raised in the preliminary debate on this when we talked about the crashed ValuJet and so on, but language in this…





