I want to join in the comments just made by my colleague from New York, the distinguished chairman of the Rules Committee. I would only offer in addition to that if you take the record of the Navy's nuclear propulsion system, the standards of safety and their performance, the military discipline and integrity that has underlain their program for all of these years, and you wanted to make an amendment to make EPA and others subject to them and give them the money to discharge it, it might make sense, but which certainly do not add any additional cost to the taxpayers for duplicating, replicating that which is already being done in a very distinguished way. The idea that people are putting things in your water and you do not know about it I think is basically pretty darn frivolous.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Navy's nuclear propulsion system and its safety standards.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
We are in a very, very difficult situation today, confronting one of the most dismal range of policy choices the House has ever had to make. We are forced to do that, in part because notwithstanding my imploring him to do that, and others…
earlier today we said a sad farewell to one of the best our Nation has to offer. I know Mike Boorda was a friend, a very special friend. Last Thursday our colleague from Mississippi, General Montgomery, spoke of him as a brother. I too…
let me begin by thanking Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. Clay for bringing this bipartisan impact aid technical corrections package to the floor. All four gentlemen have been good friends to the Impact Aid program over…
I offer my strongest endorsement to the build and charter provision in this package of reforms. This provision is relatively simple and straightforward. It provides the Secretary of the Navy with authority to enter into long-term charters…





