I want to join in the comments just made by my colleague from New York, the distinguished chairman of the Rules Committee. I would only offer in addition to that if you take the record of the Navy's nuclear propulsion system, the standards of safety and their performance, the military discipline and integrity that has underlain their program for all of these years, and you wanted to make an amendment to make EPA and others subject to them and give them the money to discharge it, it might make sense, but which certainly do not add any additional cost to the taxpayers for duplicating, replicating that which is already being done in a very distinguished way. The idea that people are putting things in your water and you do not know about it I think is basically pretty darn frivolous.
Herbert H. Bateman: “I want to join in the comments just made by my colleague from New York, the distinguished chairman of the Rules…”
On the recordMay 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Navy's nuclear propulsion system and its safety standards.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
Feb 16, 1995
I would say to the gentleman he is correct. It is written so as not to exclude the possibility of Slovenia.
Mar 30, 2000
I do have to tell my colleagues in the House that within the last hour, I have spoken to General Wilhelm; and General Wilhelm says that he does not believe this figure of a 300-person cap on military personnel in Colombia is realistic. And…
May 12, 1995
I would question, however, the ultimate analysis and where the bottom line falls. It is true that States you enumerated would not do as well under my substitute as under the Lipinski amendment. I think, however, you need to assess it in…





