I would question, however, the ultimate analysis and where the bottom line falls. It is true that States you enumerated would not do as well under my substitute as under the Lipinski amendment. I think, however, you need to assess it in the context of what is the difference between the version of the formula in the committee bill and the Bateman substitute, and all of those States would be substantially improved or enhanced under my substitute, more than they would under the bill as it comes to the floor.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of a substitute amendment on state funding during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
This issue of America's involvement in the Balkans has given me more difficulty than any public policy issue I have ever been called upon to address. I must tell my colleagues that I have no satisfaction whatsoever in the manner in which…
I would say to the gentleman he is correct. It is written so as not to exclude the possibility of Slovenia.
I will comment that this debate is about priorities. The priority here is the overriding priority of providing for our national defense which is not only an obligation, it is a constitutional obligation, and this amendment would strike at…
I also rise to express my strong support for the recommendations of the conference committee with respect to our military forces. It is the responsibility of every Member of Congress to provide our military forces with the necessary…





