I would question, however, the ultimate analysis and where the bottom line falls. It is true that States you enumerated would not do as well under my substitute as under the Lipinski amendment. I think, however, you need to assess it in the context of what is the difference between the version of the formula in the committee bill and the Bateman substitute, and all of those States would be substantially improved or enhanced under my substitute, more than they would under the bill as it comes to the floor.
Herbert H. Bateman: “I would question, however, the ultimate analysis and where the bottom line falls. It is true that States you enumerated…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of a substitute amendment on state funding during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
I agree with those who believe that the House of Representatives has no constitutional authority to censure or reprimand a President in the course of deliberations with respect to the issue of impeachment of that President
I do have to tell my colleagues in the House that within the last hour, I have spoken to General Wilhelm; and General Wilhelm says that he does not believe this figure of a 300-person cap on military personnel in Colombia is realistic. And…
I take it the gentleman agrees with me and shares my concern that if you just implemented the raw data from the new formula, 29 States would lose, some of them as much as of 9 percent of their funding.





