The courts are increasingly looking to the four corners of the law, rather than to legislative history as expressed on the Senate floor. I know the majority leader's intentions are what he said they were, namely, that this term "appropriate military assistance" would mean only equipment, weapons, supplies as I understood him.
Harry Flood Byrd: “The courts are increasingly looking to the four corners of the law, rather than to legislative history as expressed on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the interpretation of legislative intent in relation to military assistance.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
I hope that in conference every effort will be made to tie this language down to mean weapons or equipment only, and to exclude manpower in any way.
I do not think that the standing would necessarily be a major problem in a matter of this kind. Some citizens or groups or Members of Congress themselves might have standing. The point is that somebody somewhere will find a reason to go…
I have observed on many occasions that she has taken a path and chosen the unpopular approach and voted her convictions--after very careful study. I have noted that she reaches her decisions in matters of this kind after the most careful…
Only God can say, prior to the end of a fiscal year, what the outlays are finally going to be and what the receipts are going to be. What does section 6 mean, then? The Judiciary Committee reported this constitutional amendment which says…





