I hope the Senate will not support that amendment by Mr. Durenberger. It is an attempt to set up a procedure whereby the executive branch would reserve in the disaster relief fund an amount they determine would be necessary to fund the average annual amount expended for disaster relief during the preceding 5 years. The problem with this approach is that it would supersede the present process for handling emergencies that was negotiated after lengthy discussions during the 1990 budget summit and is incorporated in the budget of 1990. In so doing, the pending amendment would take away from discretionary spending the amount that would be reserved in this newly established trust fund. This would mean that we would have literally billions of dollars less to spend on discretionary spending, including defense, over the coming years if this amendment were agreed to.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Byrd opposes an amendment regarding disaster relief funding and its impact on discretionary spending.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
if I may take a couple minutes before my friend from New York leaves the floor, I congratulate him, I salute him, I greatly admire him. I think he has contributed enormously to the debate, and I look forward to the hour and the day when he…
I was a welder in the shipyards, in the McCloskey Shipyard in Tampa, FL. I was there the day the war ended, but we did not monetize the debt then. And at that time, as the Senator from New York has pointed out, the debt was 100 percent or…
Winter tames man, woman, and beast,'' but Robert Browning has announced the good news: The year's at the spring. And the day's at the morn; Morning's at seven; The hillside's dew-pearled; The lark's on the wing; The snail's on the thorn…
Mr. President, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Secretary of the Navy, have all maintained that the Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Frank Kelso, should be allowed to retire as a four-star…





