Mr. President, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Secretary of the Navy, have all maintained that the Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Frank Kelso, should be allowed to retire as a four-star admiral. They believe that his long and distinguished career, 38 years of service in the Navy, merits retirement at four stars, regardless of the blot on his escutcheon known as the Tailhook scandal. Mr. President, I respect the individuals who have made this recommendation, and I appreciate their thoughtfulness in considering the full scope of Admiral Kelso's contributions to the Navy as they have made their recommendation and as Senators have stated here on the floor today. But I cannot agree with them on this issue. As the Chief of Naval Operations since 1990, Admiral Kelso must assume responsibility for the failure of leadership that allowed the events at the Tailhook convention to occur. The continuing disgrace of the Tailhook scandal was clearly a failure of leadership, a 'deficiency of leadership' noted by Secretary Perry.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the retirement of Admiral Frank Kelso amid the Tailhook scandal.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
In this case, we are talking about microeconomic policy when we talk about balancing the budget, whether we have to raise taxes, whether we have to cut spending or have both. And we are talking also about a circumstance that may be very…
for many Americans, Washington is a nucleus of Byzantine plots and national political legerdemain, of scenarios hatched in smoke-filled rooms and of sinister conspiracies nightmared to life behind closed doors. Be that as it may…
Winter tames man, woman, and beast,'' but Robert Browning has announced the good news: The year's at the spring. And the day's at the morn; Morning's at seven; The hillside's dew-pearled; The lark's on the wing; The snail's on the thorn…
Yes, in this constitutional amendment we could include a provision that would preclude the Federal and State courts from any such involvement here or we could lay down certain limitations. But, Mr. President, as Chief Justice John Marshall…





