Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 10, 1996
as one who represents a traditionally conservative State, it's not easy to take on this issue. In fact, many of my friends and supporters have urged me to sit this one out because of the potential political fallout, but I can't do that. I feel very strongly that this legislation is fundamentally wrong--and feeling as I do I would not be true to my conscience or my oath of office if I failed to speak out against it. I believe we have an obligation to confront the very real implications of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. Despite it's name, the Defense of Marriage Act does not defend marriage against some imminent, crippling threat. Maintaining the freedom of States to define a civil union or a legal right to benefits cannot--and will not--harm the strength and power of marriage. Neither can it diminish the love between a husband and a wife, nor the devotion they feel toward their children. Whether the Government should give official sanction to same-sex relationships does raise some extremely difficult issues, Mr. President--issues of morality, of religion, of child-bearing, of marriage and of the intimacies of life. But this legislation is not really about these difficult questions of domestic relations. As a constitutional matter, it is about placing the Federal Government in the midst of an issue firmly and historically within the jurisdiction of our States.
Said by
Charles Robb
Virginia

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the implications of the Defense of Marriage Act during Senate floor debate.

Share

More from Charles Robb

Feb 3, 2000

I'm pleased to join today with my friend from Tennessee, Senator Frist, to introduce the Know Your Caller Act of 2000--a bill that will make a real and immediate difference in the lives of all Americans. Not a week goes by that I don't…

govinfo.gov
Jun 28, 2000

A majority of this body--myself included--just voted to table both the Landrieu and Jeffords amendments, each of which have the laudable goals of increasing funding for disadvantaged and special education students. The problem with both…

govinfo.gov
Oct 12, 2000

I add my voice to that of my senior colleague in thanking our colleague from Oklahoma for the way he has worked on this particular problem. For a number of months, this seemed to be one of those intractable problems that was probably not…

govinfo.gov
Apr 5, 2000

The bottom line is this particular provision in the resolution before the Senate locks in as a matter of law a permanent tax cut that would gobble up all but 2 percent of the on-budget surplus that is available. No matter how much we talk…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation