The CR's proposal before us proposes to cut $190 million from juvenile justice programs. That cut is shortsighted and misguided. Cutting effective crime prevention programs is penny wise and pound foolish because we have reams of research and demonstration programs to show that evidence-based crime prevention programs save a lot of money in avoided law enforcement, victim, incarceration, and other expenditures and actually save more than the programs cost. The current Justice Department is making excellent progress in assuring that crime prevention programs and funding are only used for those programs that have proven their effectiveness through vigorous evaluation and study and programs that have shown their effectiveness. I can see that cutting unproven programs as a result of earmarks that haven't gone through that vigorous demonstration would be appropriate, but the programs in the Justice Department should not be cut. Mr. Chairman, there are a lot of organizations that have written in opposition of the cuts in the juvenile justice programs.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing proposed cuts to juvenile justice programs in a continuing resolution.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
I’m disappointed the majority again ignores parents’ concerns, favoring divisive culture wars for political gain.
I think the gentleman from Michigan had the right to close, so I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, before I came to this body, I was a flight attendant for a national air carrier. The money that I am making today is far more than I ever made as a contract employee for an airline. Mr. Speaker, I will tell you that during the…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 241, nays 169, not voting 20, as follows: [Roll No. 83]…





