In closing let me just say we do not want to make this a partisan fight. This motion to recommit is not partisan. This motion to recommit does nothing to the bill which we are adopting except one thing: making the line-item veto effective immediately upon enactment so that this President has not only the opportunity, but the responsibility, to look at each item of spending and veto those items that he believes are inappropriate, send them back under new legislation. It is appropriate, it is responsible, it is the thing to do. I would urge adoption of the motion to recommit.
William Orton: “In closing let me just say we do not want to make this a partisan fight. This motion to recommit is not partisan. This…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a motion to recommit related to the line-item veto during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Orton
Well, Mr. Chairman, that is my concern, because as the gentleman will recall, during the debate of the line-item veto bill I rose to propose an amendment to the line-item veto bill, to apply the line-item veto to contract authority as…
CBO has it wrong, but under the gentleman's proposal CBO would have it even more wrong and we would have even higher deficits.
What this chart shows is that in each year, the CBO has underestimated deficits up until 1993, which they overestimated the deficit. About half, look at 1990, they underestimated the deficit by $119 billion. Half of that was revenue.
We did not get any money to build a road to a ski resort in Utah as they did in Pennsylvania.





