That is the point I wish to make. And if, in fact, as the gentleman has indicated, Mr. Chairman, that the line-item veto would, not only under current law but under his amendment, apply line-item veto to all contract authority, then I would favor the amendment and urge its adoption.
William Orton: “That is the point I wish to make. And if, in fact, as the gentleman has indicated, Mr. Chairman, that the line-item veto…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for an amendment related to the line-item veto.
Share
More from William Orton
In closing let me just say we do not want to make this a partisan fight. This motion to recommit is not partisan. This motion to recommit does nothing to the bill which we are adopting except one thing: making the line-item veto effective…
I will be very brief just in stating my support for the amendment. Indeed the President has, as indicated, indicated that he would do this administratively. I believe it is good to put it in statutory language. I support the amendment by…
What this chart shows is that in each year, the CBO has underestimated deficits up until 1993, which they overestimated the deficit. About half, look at 1990, they underestimated the deficit by $119 billion. Half of that was revenue.
There is a question whether the current law does apply to contract authority, which is the issue I am raising, and that is why I wish for the chairman to be on record.





