We are all agreed on both sides of the aisle and on all sides of this question that the Government should not regulate the content of speech of noncommercial broadcasters and that the Government should not discriminate against some religious speech in favor of other religious speech. The legislation that is before us says, and I quote, ``the Commission,'' referring to the Federal Communications Commission, ``should not engage in regulating the content of speech broadcasted by noncommercial educational stations.'' That is the principle of this bill, to keep the Government out of the business of regulating speech. Now, the Markey amendment does something very straightforward, at least mechanically. It inserts a word, one word, the word ``educational,'' as an adjectival modifier in front of another word, ``religious,'' so that we have an adjective on an adjective, a modifier on a modifier, and we now have something called ``education religious programming.'' The term ``educational religious programming'' is nowhere defined in statute.
Spencer Cox: “We are all agreed on both sides of the aisle and on all sides of this question that the Government should not regulate…”
On the recordJune 20, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing government regulation of speech by noncommercial broadcasters during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Spencer Cox
Jul 28, 2026
Being named the No. 1 state is an honor, but what matters most is what that ranking represents: hardworking people, strong families, and neighbors who look out for one another.
Aug 3, 2026
the best way we can support them is by preventing new fires. Please avoid anything that could create a spark, follow all fire restrictions, and stay alert.
Jul 28, 2026
The geology, the arid climate, existing infrastructure, distance from major population centers, and some of the very best people on planet Earth, make it one of the most practical locations for this kind of work.





