my motion to recommit states that the assets would go to the immigration matters that are in the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee. It has no reference at all about going to conference. I think those are very germane differences. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? Does the gentleman from Wisconsin insist on his point of order?
Share
More from Sean Reyes
We want, as Republicans and Republican AGs, climate debate. We want discussion, we want dispute, we want determination, but we want that here in Congress.
I rise today as a sponsor of H.R. 6304, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. This bill represents the culmination of more than a year's work by the members and staff of the House Intelligence Committee, together with our colleagues on the…
I do not. I think clear constitutional precedent is delegated power, and well within the purview.
let me again reassure the gentleman that every single earmark here followed the House rules. Every Member that has an earmark certified, like every Member is required to in the House, that they had no specific interest, that the spouse had…
Other voices in this conversation
