Let me again reassure the gentleman that every single earmark here followed the House rules. Every Member that has an earmark certified, like every Member is required to in the House, that they had no specific interest, that the spouse had no specific interest with the company or companies where the money was going.
Defending the integrity of earmarks during a House debate.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
I do not. I think clear constitutional precedent is delegated power, and well within the purview.
I am proud to be American. But I am also proud of my Native Hawaiian heritage, its rich cultural traditions and its contributions to this country.
The question at issue is not 'should potential tribes be recognized' but 'who should make the final determination of recognition' when so many critical interests are at stake.
Definitely the latter, Mr. Chairman, and we are proud in Utah to be a fiscally conservative state that have seen in migration from many of those states.
Other voices in this conversation
