I am here this afternoon, Madam Chair, because I spent a whole career on the border between the United States and Mexico, so I know and understand the frustrations that we face as a country about controlling and doing a better job, and understanding and identifying and stopping those that are coming into this country. This arises perhaps out of frustration, making sure that we do a better job. But this amendment is not a good idea. It was not a good idea 4 years ago, it was not a good idea last year, and it certainly is less of a good idea today, because just recently, President Bush activated 50,000 reservists. That tells us, it sends a very clear message that we do not have enough troops to go around. Those reservists that have been activated have been activated because we are about to go and make those accountable for the very acts that my colleague mentioned, the bombing and the terrible and tragic acts against the World Trade Center and against our own Pentagon. This is not an argument about illegal immigration, this is not an argument that we are engaged here in about who has a better plan. It is a practical understanding of the limitations that our military is capable of carrying out.
Sean Reyes: “I am here this afternoon, Madam Chair, because I spent a whole career on the border between the United States and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military resource limitations and immigration policy during a floor debate.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
Choosing between an unaccountable subsidiary of the executive branch versus a body like Congress, that has direct accountability to the citizens of the states, I think the choice for us is the latter.
my motion to recommit states that the assets would go to the immigration matters that are in the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee. It has no reference at all about going to conference. I think those are very germane differences. The…
I thank you for yielding, because one of the fundamental points I want to make is that we wanted to err on the side of transparency. Staff tells me that the issue of that particular earmark, weeks before we marked up the bill, was fully…
Clearly, there are politics all around, and to pretend that there is not because it is the executive branch exercising its prerogative is, I think, naive.





