I am proud to support the members of our Nation's armed services and vote for the Armed Forces Tax Fairness Act that recognizes their contributions to our Nation and our freedom. The men and women of the Armed Forces, more than any other group, deserve to be first in line when Congress considers tax cuts and special exemptions from tax obligations. At a time when so much is being asked of our service members, it is only appropriate that we make this effort. The Armed Forces Tax Fairness Act will make tax free the entire $6,000 death gratuity paid to survivors of service members killed in the line of duty. The bill also makes payments from the Defense Department's Homeowners Assistance Program tax free. The bill reduces taxes for some service members who sell their home by making changes to capital gains taxes on the sale of residences. The new rules will be helpful to those who have served on multiple deployments and have therefore lived at their residence for less than 2 of the last 5 years. Recognizing the important role played by members of the National Guard, especially at this time when they are being called upon to serve abroad and here at home in the fight against terror, the Armed Forces Tax Fairness Act allows members of the National Guard to deduct up to $1,500 in travel, lodging, and meal expenses from their taxable income if they have to travel more than 100 miles to attend National Guard and reserve meetings.
Sean Reyes: “I am proud to support the members of our Nation's armed services and vote for the Armed Forces Tax Fairness Act that…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Armed Forces Tax Fairness Act to benefit service members and their families.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
Those are two different issues. The time was an issue of Government Printing Office error. That is a different issue. I would just hope that my good friend and colleague and ranking member would agree that we sat down and agreed to bring…
my motion to recommit states that the assets would go to the immigration matters that are in the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee. It has no reference at all about going to conference. I think those are very germane differences. The…
Mr. Speaker, we bring up tonight the bill that was passed on the Senate side, S. 1927. Although this bill, in my opinion, is not the ideal bill, I think it is important that all of us understand that under the current situation that our…
I thank you for yielding, because one of the fundamental points I want to make is that we wanted to err on the side of transparency. Staff tells me that the issue of that particular earmark, weeks before we marked up the bill, was fully…





