Jason Chaffetz: “I again concur with the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Marino). This amendment strikes the applicability of judicial…”

“I again concur with the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Marino). This amendment strikes the applicability of judicial review of agency compliance with this legislation. That is why I am urging a ``no'' vote on this amendment. The legislation will begin a much-needed review of our Nation's regulatory structure and hopefully identify many outdated regulations. This amendment gets in the way of that. I think it would slow this process down. It gets rid of something that, again, makes it an alteration that I think has been well debated and well discussed. I urge the passage of the overall bill, but I stand in opposition to this amendment. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings). The amendment was rejected. Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Cummings The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 6 printed in part B of House Report 114-388.”