On the recordApril 3, 2017
But if a guy has been arrested in 43 States, he should not be eligible as a confidential informant, especially one highly paid. Zero credibility. That's disgraceful.
Source
congress.govBut if a guy has been arrested in 43 States, he should not be eligible as a confidential informant, especially one highly paid. Zero credibility. That's disgraceful.
Chaffetz criticizes the eligibility of individuals with extensive criminal records as confidential informants.
Share & report
More from Jason Chaffetz
I'd fire that guy. And you know what, until you clean house with the legal folks in your agency, you're going to have a lot of problems.
It is not always that we are able to come together on a bipartisan basis on a major piece of reform legislation.
You have a right in this government, as a government employee, to blow the whistle.
A week from Friday, or I'll issue a subpoena. And guess what? I don't need a committee vote.