The Supreme Court's recent use of foreign law as a precedent in several cases is disturbing. This judicial activism threatens our Nation's sovereignty. For example, in a capital punishment case, a justice cited the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe as precedent. Zimbabwe is led by a brutal dictator, Robert Mugabe. According to a State Department official, ``He has succeeded in reducing a once-promising nation with a bright future to a state of ruin, desolation, and isolation.'' I hope the Supreme Court in the future will not seek guidance from the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe anytime again. Our judges should enforce American laws and the United States Constitution, not the laws and legal precedents of other countries.
William F. Smith: “The Supreme Court's recent use of foreign law as a precedent in several cases is disturbing. This judicial activism…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Supreme Court's use of foreign law in judicial decisions.
Share
More from William F. Smith
This week NBC News aired an interview with President Bush in which it removed key statements from the President's response to a question about diplomatic relations with Iran. While some editing is to be expected, in this case NBC…
They expressed particular concern about requiring prior court approval to gather foreign intelligence from foreign targets located overseas. The letter says: ``Congress did not include such a requirement when it passed the original FISA…
It is important to stress that congressional oversight of Executive Branch actions is justifiable only as a means of facilitating the legislative task of enacting, amending, or repealing laws.
The Democratic majority's decision to ignore the requests of our intelligence community has endangered our national security. Why do House Democrats refuse to give the intelligence community the tools they need to protect American lives? A…





